Social media platforms, such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube provide new ways to stimulate citizen engagement in political life, where elections and electoral campaigns have a central role. Personal communication via social media brings politicians and parties closer to their potential voters. It allows politicians to communicate faster and reach citizens in a more targeted manner and vice versa, without the intermediate role of mass media. Reactions, feedback, conversations and debates are generated online as well as support and participation for offline events.
Hire Writer Surrender paradox using the German case The surrender paradox is well explained using the German case and a brief explanation of the German case would offer a good platform for understanding the case well.
The German surrender paradox means is derived from situation where the Germans were not supposed to surrender but it was a must for them to surrender. The statement sounds contradicting but it is the statement that explains the whole concept of surrender paradox.
The Germans were the main party that was involved in the Second World War, with the leadership of Hitler and the military and economic strength that Germans had, it managed to conquer many states and territories in the war Hart, Hitler had vowed that he will never surrender to any military group in his life as the German leader.
This made him to involve all the Germans who were also referred to as Nazi people in the war, many young men were involved as soldiers while the rest were involved indirect through provision of resources.
However, the energy of Hitler in the war lusted until The Nazi troops had conquered many territories during the war and thus they were much diverted in many place of Europe, this made it easy for the Allies who were fighting them to conquer them.
There are a number of reasons that made the Germans to surrender, the pearl harbor attack by the Japanese was one of the main reason, this because the United State who were very powerful got involved in the war.
The United States and the allies eventually managed to push Germany out of all territories that it had occupied. As a result of this failure the German were forced to retreat to their own territory and their leader by the name Hitler committed suicide to avoid the shame of surrender and the punishment which the Allies could subject to him.
He left his assistant in command who signed the unconditional surrender agreement which marked the end of war in Europe. The above German case gives a clear picture of surrender paradox especially in the statement which stated that the Germans could not surrender but it was a must for them to surrender.
Origin of modern monopoly states according to economist Monopoly states is where the government gains a full control of the territory it is ruling including the people in that territory. There is the old monopoly state which was exercised in 19th century and the modern monopoly state that is currently exercised.
The origin of modern monopoly states is addressed by the historian, politicians and economist but they all address the issue in different perspectives. In this paper the economist perspective on the origin of modern monopoly states will be the main focus.
Many economists had given their views concerning the origin of monopoly states but they all give the same idea and that is why it is called the economist modern monopoly states perspective Bell, Economists deal with the issue of economy when they are addressing any issue irrespective of the origin of the topic.
In this case, the economist addresses the origin of modern monopoly states in relation to economic sector that happened in s. The economist explains that inthe famous economic depression occurred. The depression affected the economy of the whole world in a greater way where many countries were left unstable in their economy.
The politicians and the economist at that time urged the government not to interfere with the situation because it would solve itself.
The government had no other option but to let the situation solve itself. However, instead of the situation going back to normal, it started deteriorating, citizens started complaining on the economic situation in the world and that is where the government took charge of the situation.
The economist later concluded that the government intervention was the only way to control the economic crises. This conclusion gave the government the total power to control all sectors of economy because it initially concentrated more on the security and political part of the country.
That is where the modern monopoly states emerged because the government gained the power to control the all areas of countries economy Beaudreau, Modern monopoly states can also be associated with socialism though some features of socialism are not included in the modern monopoly states.
The overall perspective of the origin of modern monopoly states is the s depression that led to economic crises in the whole world. The historian holds a different view because they explains that the modern monopoly states originated form the two world wars and other political factors and that is where the difference comes between the historian and economist point of view in this issue.
Paradox of Democratic Exuberance European political history gives a clear picture of the paradox of democratic exuberance in the past and in the modern world. A lot of studies have been done on the issue of democracy where democracy in retreat history book by Joshua J gives a detailed concept of paradox of exuberance.
Paradox of democratic exuberance means the cheerfulness of having a democracy which indeed is of no help to the people. The situation was identified during the Post during the development of democracy in many European countries. Democracy means ruling of people where people of middle class are given a chance to raise their views on issues of their concern.The third group of essays embeds contemporary American politics in two other contexts.
First, in a comparative context, developments in the European democracies are the mirror image of those in the United States: the major European parties have depolarized or de-sorted or both, whereas their national electorates show little change.
Contemporary politics with a focus on Europe Introduction Contemporary comparative politics can only be well understood through a critical analysis of the European politics . The Nationalism In The Contemporary World Politics Essay.
Print Reference This essay will be focusing on the ethnic conflict that erupted predominantly in Eastern Europe as a result of the dissolution of the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia in the late twentieth century.
Focus will then turn solely to Bosnia and at the key. Contemporary Politics.
Impact Factor. Search in: Advanced search. Submit an article. New content alerts RSS. Citation search. Citation search. Current The global politics of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender human rights: an introduction Kollman et al.
European History as Told Through Diaghilevs Rite of Spring - Many often associate the 19th Century with old-fashioned ideas and customs, whereas the 20th Century is seen as the ‘modern era’.
Political Ideology in The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli - Niccolò Machiavelli transformed political theory by forming new ideas essential to the progress of Europe in the 16th century, strengthening the Heads of State in Italy, and revolutionizing views on politics through his views of power and dominance.